By
Willow Osgood
BEIRUT:
The Special Tribunal for Lebanon is hearing defense pretrial motions
challenging the jurisdiction of the court and the legality of its creation.
The
court’s Trial Chamber is set to hear arguments from the defense counsel, the
prosecution’s response to the defense motions, and observations from the
attorneys representing registered victims.
The
defense will argue that the U.N. Security Council overstepped its bounds when
it established the court under Chapter VII of the U.N Charter as the attack did
not constitute a threat to “international peace and security,” which is a
prerequisite according to the Charter for U.N intervention.
The
defense will also contend that the resolution violated U.N. law, is
unconstitutional under Lebanese law and is a violation of Lebanese sovereignty.
Last
year, the STL indicted four members of Hezbollah for involvement in the
assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005. Hezbollah has
denied that the four were involved in the crime.
Antoine
Korkmaz, defense attorney for Mustafa Baddredine, kicked off the hearing by
arguing that the U.N. Security Council abused its power by intervening in the
internal affairs of Lebanon.
He
also accused the council of invoking Chapter VII to ensure the success of one
political party over others instead of maintaining peace and security, stating
at one point that the Security Council “took sides.”
Korkmaz
also contended that in 2007, the year the Security Council voted to establish
the court, the threat to peace which the U.N. had thought existed in 2005 had
failed to materialize.
Video feed of the hearing
can be watched on the court’s website with a 30-minute delay; there will also
be live updates from the court on Twitter.http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2012/Jun-13/176685-stl-opens-hearing-on-challenges-to-its-legality-and-jurisdiction.ashx#axzz1xaZDFUkH
No comments:
Post a Comment