Baragwanath briefed President Michel
Sleiman and Prime Minister Najib Mikati on the progress of the U.N.-backed
court in separate meetings in Beirut
Monday.
Baragwanath did not make statements
following the two meetings.
Baragwanath, who arrived in the
country Sunday, updated the Lebanese leaders on recent decisions of the STL,
which is responsible for investigating and trying those responsible for the
2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. The court moved in
February to begin in absentia proceedings against the four men accused in the
attack.
It is Baragwanath’s second visit to Lebanon . Last
November, the judge met with Sleiman and Mikati, as well as Justice Minister
Shakib Qortbawi and Foreign Affairs Minister Adnan Mansour. At the time, the
government was embroiled in a dispute centered on payment of Lebanon ’s share
of funding to court.
Baragwanath, who serves in the STL’s
Appeal Chamber, was first elected as the court’s president after the late Judge
Antonio Cassese resigned last October. In March, he was re-elected for a term
of 18 months.
Later Monday, the New Zealand
jurist delivered a lecture at La Sagesse University on international law and
Lebanese law, explaining how diverse legal traditions have played a role in the
court.
The talk, which was attended by the
vice president of the STL, Judge Ralph Riachi, the chancellor of La Sagesse
University, Maronite Archbishop of Beirut Paul Matar, and faculty and students,
also focused on the common heritage of Lebanese and international law.
“The interface among Lebanon , the
wider world and the law is nothing new. It began nearly 2000 years ago with the
great law school in Beirut ,” he said, explaining
how the city played a pioneering role in Roman law, which formed the basis of
the civil law tradition of Europe .
Baragwanath said that legal
practitioners continue to turn to Roman law “to discern principles to solve the
real life disputes that are a result of our humanity,” and cited the court’s
statute as evidence of the continued influence of Roman law.
“In Article 16, there are the basic
principles, fundamental to human rights like, the presumption of innocence.
What could be more fundamental than that?” he said. “The right to a public
hearing, equally fundamental ... that you can’t be prosecuted a second time and
the right to examine witnesses.”
The STL also turned to Roman law
last year when discussing what ‘terrorism’ means in the law of Lebanon and
international criminal law, a topic Baragwanath called “very difficult.”
“We discovered that various themes
of our judgment were assisted in consideration by the Roman law. The principle,
in dubio mitius – in case of doubt – you take the position that is more
advantageous to the accused,” he said, explaining that in particular instances,
when international and Lebanese law differed, the court took the version more
favorable to the defendants.
Baragwanath went on to discuss the application
of Lebanese criminal code in the court, which is required by the court’s
statute, giving the example of a decision made in the Appeals Chamber. The
judges decided, based on two fundamental Lebanese principles, that former
general Jamil al-Sayyed, who was held for four years for the 2005 attack, was
entitled to view the documents used to detain him.
By Willow
Osgood
No comments:
Post a Comment