The Lebanese Center for Human Rights (CLDH) is a local non-profit, non-partisan Lebanese human rights organization in Beirut that was established by the Franco-Lebanese Movement SOLIDA (Support for Lebanese Detained Arbitrarily) in 2006. SOLIDA has been active since 1996 in the struggle against arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and the impunity of those perpetrating gross human violations.

Search This Blog

May 24, 2012

The Daily Star - Lawyer: U.S. pressuring France on jailed Lebanese, May 24 2012


By Van Meguerditchian
PARIS: France’s refusal to release George Ibrahim Abdallah is outrageous, according to his legal counsel, French attorney Jacque Vergès. In an interview with The Daily Star at his office near Pigalle in Paris, Vergès – who has represented a number of notorious defendants such as Nazi war criminal Klaus Barbie and Venezuelan terrorist Illich Ramirez Sanchez (known also as Carlos the Jackal) – said French authorities have surrendered their decision-making to the Americans in the case of Abdallah.
The 61-year-old prisoner, a one-time member of the Lebanese Armed Revolutionary Factions, was captured in 1984 and sentenced to life in prison in 1987 for the murder of American Lieutenant Col. Charles Ray and the killing of an Israeli diplomat, Yacov Barsimentov, in Paris. Supporters of Abdallah maintain that he has served his sentence and should be released.
Below is an excerpt of an interview with Vergès.
Q: Why is Lebanese prisoner George Ibrahim Abdallah still behind bars in France?
A: French authorities are serving American interests. I have written in several letters sent to some officials that I don’t want the French judicial system to behave like a prostitute for the Americans. I have used that word. I sincerely regret that the Lebanese government is not putting the same pressure on the French judiciary as the American government does. Should Abdallah’s friends kidnap another French citizen in Lebanon to get him out of the jail? His sentence is over now, it’s not illegal to keep him in jail, but it’s scandalous.
Nelson Mandela was in jail, it wasn’t illegal to keep him in jail either. France’s top former intelligence official Yves Bonnet said recently that France broke its promises when it gave guarantees to free Abdallah in 1985 in exchange for the freedom of kidnapped French citizen Gilles Peyrolles. The French was released, but Abdallah remained in jail.
Q: How are the Americans pressuring France not to free Abdallah? Is the French judiciary succumbing to that pressure?
A: It is very simple: the American government is a plaintiff in the trial. It is contrary to the French legal standards. For example, a French woman has been a prisoner in Mexico (Florence Cassez) for many years now. The French government is trying to negotiate her liberation, but they are not taking part in the trial. In Abdallah’s case, a lawyer is representing the American government.
Q: When did Abdallah become your client? Why have you strongly called for his release from prison?
A: When Abdallah was arrested, he chose me as his lawyer. He has the right to be released. He has been in jail for 28 years now ... He should have been released 8 years ago. Yves Bonnet and the prosecutor have called this situation unacceptable as well.
Q: Former French President Francois Mitterrand pardoned another Lebanese prisoner in France, Anis Naccashe. Why was Naccashe’s case different and who helped bring about his release?
A: In Naccache’s case, the Iranian government officially asked for his liberation. The Lebanese government only offered to give him a passport in case he is released. The American government was not part of Naccache’s trial. Abdallah has two difficulties: the Americans are directly interfering to keep him in jail, and the Lebanese government is not putting pressure on the French judiciary.
Q: When defending Abdallah, how did you challenge the prosecution?
A: The defense strategy is chosen by my clients. [Abdallah] chose not to be defended because he thought that the court was under America’s command. In that condition he didn’t need to defend himself. He thought he had done his duty as an Arab defending the Palestinian cause. During the trial, the prosecutor told the court, “Don’t listen to the American voice.” Abdallah’s position was “you [the court] are under the American government’s command, I don’t see why I should justify myself in front of you.” The truth is, at the same time in France, several defenders of the Palestinian cause were assassinated by the Mossad, and no one was arrested for those murders. Abdallah didn’t contest the judgment, he contested the sentence. He said that at that time, France was a battlefield where Israel was allowed to do anything and where the other side was punished with extreme severity.
Q: France says there are no political prisoners. Do you agree? How do you define a political case?
A: In France, there is no difference between political cases and civil cases and that’s the bad thing. What is scandalous about Abdallah is the time he spent in jail. His sentence is over, he has very good behavior in prison, and he even defended a prisoner attacked by other inmates. Keeping him in jail is not in line with French laws. According to French law, he should be released. That’s why I came to Beirut few years ago with former Minister of Foreign Affairs Roland Dumas for a press conference and called for the liberation of Abdallah.
Q: What is the well-known rupture defense, which you have introduced in trials? Have you used it in defense of Abdallah?
A: No, Abdallah chose not to be defended anyway. The rupture defense is not my only defense strategy. The rupture defense is when the defendant and the judges don’t share the same values. For example, during the war between France and Algeria, the judge was telling the defendant “you are French; the FLN is not a resistance organization but a terrorist group.” The defendant was answering “I am Algerian and the FLN is a resistance movement.” They had opposing values. That is rupture defense.
Q: What do you think about international courts?
A: All people condemned by the International [Criminal] Court are African people. It’s as if nothing happened in Abu Ghraib [in Iraq, or] there were no crimes in other parts of the world. Many people don’t have to face trials, [but] only African people are judged. The balance is not equal. The Americans are not held accountable. For example when France attacked Libya, only Moammar Gadhafi was charged, but others who committed atrocities have not been charged. We know that many Africans have been murdered, and no one has been charged for that. The same case took place during the 2011 war in Ivory Coast, when supporters of former President Laurent Gbagbo were killed by rebels.


http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2012/May-24/174461-lawyer-us-pressuring-france-on-jailed-lebanese.ashx#axzz1vhEIdAun

No comments:

Post a Comment

Archives