The Lebanese Center for Human Rights (CLDH) is a local non-profit, non-partisan Lebanese human rights organization in Beirut that was established by the Franco-Lebanese Movement SOLIDA (Support for Lebanese Detained Arbitrarily) in 2006. SOLIDA has been active since 1996 in the struggle against arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and the impunity of those perpetrating gross human violations.

Search This Blog

July 28, 2011

The Daily Star - Child drowns near beach south of Beirut - July 28, 2011

BEIRUT: A 7-year-old child drowned near Khaldeh beach, the state-run National News Agency reported Wednesday.
Rabih Sultan Abu Fakher drowned near Khaldeh public beach Tuesday evening around 6 p.m.
Civil Defense workers from the Marine Rescue Unit were able to recover his body. 


The Daily Star - Celebratory gunfire injures man in Sabra - July 28, 2011

BEIRUT: A man was injured by a stray bullet from celebratory gunfire following a speech by Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah, the National News Agency said Wednesday.
The NNA said shots were fired in the air mainly in Beirut’s southern suburbs, following Nasrallah’s speech Tuesday, wounding a man in the area of Sabra.
In a separate incident, a dispute turned violent near Abu Daoud playground in Ouzai when two men shot at a group of people, injuring one of them in the shoulder. The victim was taken to Rafik Hariri University hospital for treatment.


The Daily Star - Activists lobby to change nationality law - July 28, 2011

By Marie Dhumières
Thousands of children have no entitlement to Lebanese nationality. Mohamad Azakir - 7/28/2011
Thousands of children have no entitlement to Lebanese nationality. Mohamad Azakir - 7/28/2011

BEIRUT: Several hundred women’s rights activists marched in Beirut Wednesday calling for a reform of the Nationality Law, which doesn’t allow women to pass on their nationality to their families.
“I’m Lebanese … and my son is American,” said Anastasia Walker, who married an American man and said she was “completely ignorant” of the Nationality Law before her now 2-year-old son was born.
“As a Lebanese woman, not being able to give my nationality to my son is frustrating,” the 37-year-old said, adding she felt like “less of a person.”
The current Nationality Law, which was adopted under the French Mandate in 1925, allows men to pass on their nationality to their non-Lebanese wives and children a year after their marriage is registered, but prohibits Lebanese women, married to non-Lebanese, from doing the same.
According to U.N. figures in 2010, around 18,000 Lebanese women married non-Lebanese men between 1995 and 2008, and 41,400 individuals are children of a Lebanese mother and a foreign father.
A draft law aimed at replacing the current Nationality Law was first presented to Parliament in 2005, but was never examined by legislators.
A minor breakthrough was achieved last year, as a decree approved in April 2010 and effective since September now allows the children of Lebanese mothers and foreign fathers to be granted a renewable three-year residency permit.
With the formation of a new Cabinet and Speaker Nabih Berri announcing last week that legislative sessions to approve a series of bills will begin Aug. 3, activists are hoping the draft law will finally be debated.
Protesters chanting slogans such as “Me, my husband and my sons are strangers in this country” and “This is your right, women” marched from the Interior Ministry in Sanayeh to Riad Solh square, where organizers handed a copy of the draft law to a government representative, Omar Natour, the director general of the Justice Ministry
“We’re mobilizing because we now have a new government, and we’re hoping it can do something to change the law,” said Lama Naja, from the campaign, “My nationality is my right and the right of my family,” organizing the demonstration.
She said she had no idea whether the draft law would be put on the legislative session’s agenda.
“We haven’t heard anything … we’re hoping they will amend [the law] but nothing is certain,” Naja said, arguing the obstacles preventing the law’s approval are still the same.
“It’s hard because of sectarian groups who think a reform of the Nationality Law will affect the demographic balance between religions,” she said, adding that the idea that “most Lebanese women marry Muslims” is still very present.
Many believe that the new law would also lead to naturalization of Palestinian refugees married to Lebanese women.
A study entitled “Predicament of Lebanese Women Married to Non-Lebanese,” published in December 2009 by the National Committee for the Follow-up on Women’s Issues, proved the argument was unfounded, with only 2 percent of Lebanese women marrying non-Lebanese.
“We’ve been lobbying for years, and because of the unstable political situation, this law has never seen the light,” said Farah Kobaissy, an activist from the feminist group Nasawiya, who added that there were “no excuses anymore for not passing the law.”
To her, the arguments opposing the law are “silly” and are no more than “excuses” used by “all governments” not to pass the law.
She believed that even if the new law would actually put the demographic balance at risk, “women’s rights come first.”
Ali, a 32-year-old who preferred not to give his last name, said his sister was affected by the law and said he would campaign for the law to be reformed because “It’s about human rights.”
Mayada Abdallah, 30, said that since “Lebanon signed all international conventions; we must have this right.” She described the situation as “unbelievable in a democratic country.”
Lebanon ratified the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women in 1996, but expressed reservations about article 9.2, which stipulates that states should grant women equal rights with men with respect to the nationality of their children.
Women’s rights activists have since then been calling for the reservation to be withdrawn.


L'orient Le Jour - Question écrite de Hajjar : Qui a enlevé les Estoniens, pour quels motifs et qui les a libérés ? - July 28, 2011

Le député Mohammad Hajjar a adressé hier, au nom du bloc parlementaire du courant du Futur, une question écrite au gouvernement portant sur le dossier des otages estoniens.
« Conformément aux dispositions de l’article 124 du statut interne de la Chambre, j’ai présenté une question écrite au Parlement concernant les 7 otages estoniens, souligne M. Hajjar. J’ai tardé à rendre publique ma démarche à la demande du président de la Chambre, Nabih Berry, afin qu’il puisse apposer sa signature », a indiqué M. Hajjar.

Ce dernier explique dans la question posée au gouvernement les circonstances qui ont accompagné le kidnapping des 7 Estoniens, le 23 mars dernier. Il ajoute que « les forces de l’ordre ont réussi à mettre la main sur un groupe de personnes suspectes, soupçonnées d’avoir pris part à cet enlèvement. Elles ont également mis la main sur le véhicule qui a servi à l’opération ». Le député est également revenu sur les deux vidéos envoyées par les géôliers, dont l’origine s’est avérée être le territoire syrien.
Il dit démontrer également « comment les autorités ont été surprises de la liberation des otages, liberation annoncée par les médias le 14 juillet dernier ». « Les autorités n’ont eu vent de cette information que par le biais des médias », alors que les causes de cette opération restent inconnues.
« Les citoyens et par conséquent leurs députés ont le droit de connaître la vérité » concernant cette affaire, notamment de savoir « qui a kidnappé les citoyens estoniens, pour quels motifs et qui a ordonné leur libération ».
Les Libanais ont également le droit de savoir « pourquoi l’État s’est montré incapable » de résoudre ce dossier, a conclu Mohammad Hajjar. 

Archives